Taxpayer Identification Numbers (TIN) |
|
|
Expatriation Tax
Posted February 10, 2010 by Stuart Rohatiner, CPA, JDCategories: Accounting, Finance, International Tax, Tax
Tags: Expatriation Tax, Form 8854, IRC 877
Expatriation Tax |
||
|
Classification of Taxpayers for U.S. Tax Purposes
Posted February 10, 2010 by Stuart Rohatiner, CPA, JDCategories: Accounting, International Tax, Tax
Tags: Check-the-box Entities, Foreign Person, United States Person
|
Taxation of Dual-Status Aliens
Posted February 9, 2010 by Stuart Rohatiner, CPA, JDCategories: Accounting, Finance, Financial News, International Tax, Law, Tax
Tags: dual status alien, income from US Sources, nonresident alien, not effectively connected, resident alien
|
Taxation of Nonresident Aliens
Posted February 9, 2010 by Stuart Rohatiner, CPA, JDCategories: Accounting, Finance, International Tax, Tax
Tags: annual or periodical, departing alien, determinable, effectively connected, fixed, Form 1040-C, green card, substantial presence test, US citizen, US national
|
Alien Taxation – Certain Essential Concepts
Posted February 9, 2010 by Stuart Rohatiner, CPA, JDCategories: Accounting, International Tax, Questions & Answers, Tax
Tags: Alien concepts, dual-status aliens, foreign person defined, foreign students and scholars, income types. tax withholding on foreign persons, nonresident aliens, resident aliens, source of income, tax treaties, taxpayer identifcation number, us person
Alien Taxation – Certain Essential Concepts |
|
|
IRS Silent Amidst Estate Tax Chaos
Posted February 8, 2010 by Stuart Rohatiner, CPA, JDCategories: Accounting, Tax
Tags: IRS, estate tax, wait-and see- approach, disposition of assets, Jan 1
From Tax Prof Blog, Sunday, February 7, 2010. Wall Street Journal, IRS Silent So Far On New US Tax Rules For Inherited Wealth, by Martin Vaughan: The IRS is taking a wait-and-see approach on issuing guidance dealing with taxes on inherited wealth, unsure whether Congress will act in the next several months to change the rules again. Advisers to the wealthy say they are left without a roadmap on a number of issues related to the disposition of assets left behind by those who have died since Jan. 1. In particular, they are looking to IRS for rules on how a new capital gains-tax regime that took effect this year will apply to estates. … Congress might pass legislation that reinstates the estate tax for 2010 and eliminates the carry-over basis rules, which would make all such planning moot. That may explain why IRS for now is waiting for the legislative picture to come into focus. Another option that is getting some discussion by congressional staff is an election that would allow the family members of people who died between Jan. 1, 2010 and when new legislation takes effect to choose between paying estate taxes, for example at the rates in effect in 2009, or the capital gains-tax regime under the current law.
Certain Cash Contributions for Haiti Relief Can Be Deducted on Your Tax Return
Posted February 8, 2010 by Stuart Rohatiner, CPA, JDCategories: Accounting, Tax
Tags: 2010, Cash Contributions, Haiti, earthquake, after January 11, and before March 1
Certain Cash Contributions for Haiti Relief Can Be Deducted on Your 2009 Tax Return.
A new law allows you to choose to deduct certain charitable contributions of money on your 2009 tax return instead of your 2010 return. The contributions must have been made after January 11, 2010, and before March 1, 2010, for the relief of victims in areas affected by the January 12, 2010, earthquake in Haiti. Contributions of money include contributions made by cash, check, money order, credit card, charge card, debit card, or via cell phone. The new law was enacted after the 2009 forms, instructions, and publications had already been printed. When preparing your 2009 tax return, you may complete the forms as if these contributions were made on December 31,2009, instead of in 2010. To deduct your charitable contributions, you must itemize deductions on Schedule A (Form 1040) or Schedule A (Form 1040NR). The contribution must be made to a qualified organization and meet all other requirements for charitable contribution deductions. However, if you made the contribution by phone or text message, a telephone bill showing the name of the donee organization, the date of the contribution, and the amount of the contribution will satisfy the recordkeeping requirement. Therefore, for example, if you made a $10 charitable contribution by text message that was charged to your telephone or wireless account, a bill from your telecommunications company containing this information satisfies the record keeping requirement.
Cross-Border Tax Issues
Posted February 1, 2010 by Stuart Rohatiner, CPA, JDCategories: Accounting, International Tax, Tax
Tags: Cross-Border Tax Issues, foreign withholding tax rules, Form 5471, Form 8865, impute interest, transfer pricing
By JAMES COLLINS , JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY, FEBRUARY 2010 CFOs can exercise reasonable diligence to ensure that they have procedures in place to deal with some of the more common shortcomings in cross-border tax compliance. The following are some routine tax compliance situations that U. S. companies ($500 million or less in sales) with outbound activities are most likely to encounter:
1. Ensure that intercompany working capital accounts to the parent company and among foreign affiliates are settled every 120 days or that market interest is charged on overdue receivables. Buildups of intercompany payables to a foreign parent or affiliate, without regular and ongoing settlement, can cause the IRS to impute interest income to the creditor for U.S. tax purposes.
2. Document foreign payments at reduced or zero rates of withholding tax. The payer is liable for withholding tax that it fails to withhold and bears the burden of proof that the proper amount has been withheld. Prudent CFOs will periodically test to ensure that their accounts payable personnel are familiar with foreign withholding tax rules and are maintaining proper documentation for payments made overseas.
3. Address intercompany cross-border pricing issues. The ultimate protection against IRS tax assessments on pricing issues is an advanced pricing agreement (APA) whereby the IRS abides by intercompany pricing it has already reviewed with the taxpayer and its representatives (usually an economist, accountant or lawyer). The next level of security is a pricing study whereby a professional firm compiles and reviews a company’s intercompany pricing arrangements, analyzes them, and issues a report. Finally, a company can greatly reduce the exposure for routine transactions by finding comparable transactions with unrelated parties and ensuring that charges and costs for transactions among related companies are comparably priced.
4. Determine tax status of foreign affiliates. If a U.S. company owns shares in a foreign company, it may qualify as a passive foreign investment company if it has a high proportion of assets or income that is passive. For this purpose, cash is considered a passive asset, so newly formed companies are especially vulnerable. If a U.S. company owns 10% or more of a foreign corporation, it should evaluate whether other U.S. shareholders that each own a 10% or greater interest own in aggregate an additional 40%. If they do, the foreign affiliate likely is a controlled foreign corporation, subject to the anti-deferral regime of subpart F of the Internal Revenue Code.
5. Ensure that interest expense due to foreign affiliates is deducted on a cash basis on the U.S. tax return. For tax purposes, interest accrued to foreign affiliates is usually deductible, but only when actually paid.
6. Evaluate whether the company is obligated to file Form 8865, Return of U.S. Persons With Respect to Certain Foreign Partnerships, and Form 8865, Schedule O, Transfer of Property to a Foreign Partnership (under section 6038B). If a U.S. company owns 10% or more of a foreign-organized affiliate or it has contributed more than $100,000 in property to a foreign partnership during any 12-month period, the company should evaluate whether it must file Form(s) 8865 and Schedule O. File forms 5471 and 8865 with the tax return for each separate controlled foreign corporation or foreign partnership.
7. Form 5471, Information Return of U.S. Persons With Respect to Certain Foreign Corporations, and Form 8865 are required for each separate legal entity, even if the companies are organized in the same country and even if a subconsolidation of financial information for two or more separate foreign entities is available. —By James Collins (jcollins@friedmanllp.com), a senior manager at Friedman LLP in New York.