Posted tagged ‘CPA’

Unmarried Couples and Home Mortgage Interest

November 20, 2011

It is becoming increasingly common for couples to live together and remain unmarried, which can lead to potential tax problems when they share the expenses of a home but only one of the couple is liable for the debt on that home.

Home mortgage interest can generally be deducted only by a person who is legally obligated to pay the mortgage (in other words, a person who is named as an obligor on the mortgage document). However, there is an exception to the preceding general rule for interest paid on a real estate mortgage when a person is a legal or equitable owner of the real estate but is not directly liable for the debt.

For example, if the one who is not liable on the mortgage makes the payment, that individual is not allowed to deduct the interest portion of the payment and neither is the other person, because he or she did not pay it.  This can lead to some complications where one of the couple is the bread winner and would benefit tax-wise from an interest deduction, but the other person is the liable party on the loan.  It is not uncommon for couples who both work to share the mortgage payments in the mistaken belief that they can each deduct their share of the mortgage interest on their individual tax returns.

Although state law governs what constitutes equitable ownership, equitable ownership can generally be established if both parties are on title to the property even if only one is liable on the loan. The premise behind equitable ownership is that an individual is protecting his or her ownership in the home by making some or all of the mortgage payments.

This position was recently upheld in a 2011 Tax Court decision where the court denied a taxpayer’s home mortgage interest deduction that she paid until she became co-owner of the property with her boyfriend and was legally obligated to make the mortgage payments.

IRS Posts Revised Form 941 and Instructions for Claiming New Hire Payroll Tax Exemption

May 21, 2010

MAY 18, 2010

Stuart Rohatiner, CPA, JD

On May 18, the IRS posted a new version of Form 941, Employer’s QUARTERLY Federal Tax Return, and its instructions for claiming the special payroll tax exemption that applies to new workers hired in 2010.

The Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act (HIRE Act) created a payroll tax exemption for employers who hire workers who have been unemployed for at least 60 days and who are not replacement hires. For qualifying new employees hired after Feb. 3, 2010, and before Jan. 1, 2011, an employer can claim an exemption equal to the employer’s share of Social Security taxes on wages paid in 2010 after March 19.

On the newly revised Form 941, employers will claim the exemption related to wages paid after March 31 on lines 6a through 6e (or on lines 12c through 12e for the exemption related to wages paid between March 19 and March 31). These lines ask for the number of qualified employees who were first paid exempt wages or tips in the quarter, the number of qualified employees who were paid exempt wages or tips in the quarter, and the amount of the wages and tips paid to qualified employees, which are multiplied by 0.062 (the amount of the employer’s share of Social Security tax). This amount is subtracted from the total Social Security and Medicare tax reported on line 5d.

The exemption for the employer’s share of Social Security taxes on wages paid to eligible employees between March 19 and March 31 is treated on the second quarter Form 941 as an April 1 tax deposit and does not adjust the amount of tax liability reported on lines 10 and 17.

The instructions say that an employer cannot claim the Social Security tax exemption and the work opportunity credit for the same employee. If an employer does not wish to claim the Social Security tax exemption for an eligible employee, the employer omits that employee and his or her wages from lines 6a through 6d (and lines 12c through 12e, if applicable).

To be a qualified employee for purposes of the payroll tax exemption, the employee must have signed Form W-11, Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act Employee Affidavit, (or a similar statement) under penalties of perjury. The employee must not be a replacement hire, unless the worker being replaced separated from service voluntarily or for cause, and the employee cannot be related to the employer or to a 50% owner.

New Guidance Targets Loan Modifications

May 4, 2010

May 2, 2010
Journal of Accountancy

Responding to the recent rise in loan modifications, FASB on Thursday updated standards related to troubled-debt restructuring.

Amendments in the update are aimed at increasing comparability regarding modifications of loans accounted for within pools under ASC Subtopic 310-30, Receivables—Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality.

FASB said differences in practice had developed over whether a loan that is part of a pool of loans accounted for as a single asset should be removed from that pool after a modification that would constitute a troubled-debt restructuring. The objective of the amendments is to address the diversity in practice regarding such transactions.

“In the view of certain entities, accounting for troubled debt restructuring does not apply to individual loans within a pool, and modified loans should remain within the pool,” according to the update. “In the view of other entities, each modified loan should be evaluated against the troubled debt restructuring criteria, and if the loan modification is a troubled debt restructuring, the modified loan should be removed from the pool and accounted for as a separate asset.”

The amendments also clarify guidance about maintaining the integrity of a pool as the unit of accounting for acquired loans with credit deterioration.

Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-18, Receivables (Topic 310): Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan Is Part of a Pool That Is Accounted for as a Single Asset (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force), is effective for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010. The amendments are to be applied prospectively. Early application is permitted.

“Upon initial adoption of the guidance … an entity may make a one-time election to terminate accounting for loans as a pool under Subtopic 310-30,” according to the update. “This election may be applied on a pool-by-pool basis and does not preclude an entity from applying pool accounting to subsequent acquisitions of loans with credit deterioration.”

Five Lessons From Your ’09 Tax Return

May 1, 2010

From MoneyWatch.com:

These Money-Making Tips Will Help you Analyze Last Year’s Finances in Order to Lower Your Taxes in the Future

(MoneyWatch.com)  This story, by Jill Schlesinger, originally appeared on CBS’ Moneywatch.com

Your 2009 taxes are done. Congratulations! But you’re not done yet. (Sorry.) While you have all your 2009 tax forms and documents handy, this is the perfect time to analyze last year’s finances and use those insights to lower your taxes in 2010 and beyond.

The sooner you get started, the more you can save. So, take a big breath and then take these five steps:

1. Avoid a Big Tax Refund

You think you love getting a tax refund. What’s not to like about found money? But a refund is really just the return of a year-long, interest-free loan that you extended to your spendthrift Uncle Sam.

You can do much smarter things with that money, like putting it into a retirement plan or a college savings fund. So if you will be receiving a 2009 refund of more than a few thousand dollars and you’re an employee, adjust your withholding at work. If you’re self-employed, lower your quarterly estimated tax payments accordingly.

If your 2010 income will be less than $75,000 ($150,000 if you’re married and will file jointly), be sure your tax withholding has been properly adjusted for the new Making Work Pay Tax Credityou’re entitled to receive this year. This credit (up to $400 for singles and $800 for couples) should be reflected in the amount of taxes taken out of your paycheck. But you may need to submit a revised W-4, especially if you’re holding down multiple jobs or you’re married, since your employer wouldn’t know about your extra work or your spouse’s income.

2. Save More in Your Retirement Plan

If you are not maxing out your employer-sponsored, tax-deferred retirement plan, you’re missing outon the single best opportunity to save on taxes.

I know that the idea of saving more may be difficult these days, as so many people are just getting back on their feet. But if you can squeeze just an extra 1 or 2 percent out of your paycheck and pour that cash into the plan, you’ll reduce your taxable income and your 2010 tax bill.

Doing so might also bring your income under certain thresholds that will let you qualify for bigger tax breaks you’d otherwise miss – such as personal exemptions, itemized deductions, an Individual Retirement Account, the Child Tax Credit, the Child and Dependent Care Credit, and the Hope and Lifetime Learning Credits for college.

Here’s an example, courtesy of Research401k.com: Say you’re a single person earning $50,000 and in the 25 percent tax bracket. Without making a 401(k) contribution, you might owe $12,500 in taxes this year. By contributing $4,000 to the plan, however, you’d lower your taxable income to $46,000 and might owe $11,500 in taxes. Essentially, the government lends you $1,000 to invest for your future and you don’t have to pay the loan back until you withdraw the money from the 401(k) in retirement.
3. Look into Muni Bonds and Funds

If you have money in interest-paying bank accounts, CDs, money market funds, or taxable bonds or bond funds, you could be adding to your tax liability. High-income taxpayers need to be especially concerned since their tax liability will rise as a result of the passage of health care reform.

You may want to consider moving some of those taxable savings and investments into tax-free municipal bond funds. I’m a fan of ones from Vanguard (VWITX), T. Rowe Price (PRTAX) and Fidelity (FLTMX).

After a stellar 2009, muni funds are not quite as good a deal as they were last year, compared with taxable investments. Still, if you are in a high tax bracket, muni funds could offer a better tax-exempt yield. To see how much more in your case, use this taxable-equivalent yield calculator. Just be aware that the sweet yields on munis come with some extra risk, since there’s always a possibility that a few bond issuers won’t make their payments. Historically, that risk is pretty slim, but it’s not zero.

4. Lower Your Mutual Fund Taxes

As the equity and fixed income markets recover from the financial meltdown, be on the lookout for mutual fund taxable distributions. A distribution is one of the most aggravating features of a managed mutual fund: You are on the hook for capital gains on the fund’s investments as well as the fund’s tax liability. You may even be taxed on gains the fund incurred before you owned it!

One way to limit the damage before you invest is to ask the fund company if it will be making a distribution soon. If the answer is “yes,” hold off buying until afterward.

Or you might invest in funds with low turnover ratios, such as index funds, since they’ll be less likely to throw off taxable distributions. A turnover ratio below 10 percent is generally tax-efficient. (A fund’s annual report will show its turnover rate.) Morningstar’s Fund Screener tool can help you find low-turnover stock funds.

One class of mutual funds, tax-managed funds, is all about keeping your tax liability down. These funds do so by keeping turnover low and avoiding dividend-paying stocks. Some tax-managed funds own stocks; some own stocks and bonds. Morningstar and Yahoo! Finance’s Mutual Funds Center can help you find them.

5. Keep Better Tax Records

Organizing your tax records might not only lower your tax liability, it could help you get rid of the tax-filing headache sooner. Create a file called “Taxes 2010” and throughout the year toss into it business receipts; bank, brokerage, and mutual fund statements; W-2s; 1099s; property tax bills; and mortgage interest statements. And keep track of your purchase price, commission, and sales price for any investment transactions in 2010. You’ll thank yourself in April 2011.

• Last-Minute Tax-Filing Strategies

• How to File for an Extension

What if You Can’t Pay the IRS?

• Save Time Filing Your Taxes

• Lower Your Taxes in 2010

Also important: self employment tax information, paying your estimated taxes

Health Care Reform Reshapes Tax Code

April 30, 2010

By ALISTAIR M. NEVIUS, J.D.

April 1, 2010

In March, Congress passed two pieces of legislation designed to reform the U.S. health care system. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PL 111-148) was enacted on March 23, and was quickly followed by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (PL 111-152), which amended several portions of the first act, as well as adding new provisions of its own. While the legislation generally deals with the health care system, it contains many revisions to the Internal Revenue Code. Individuals and businesses are affected and are likely to look to their accountants and financial advisers for guidance and compliance help.

Among other things, the legislation provides a credit to help individuals afford insurance; it also imposes a penalty on individuals who do not obtain health insurance. Small businesses that provide health coverage for their employees are also eligible for a credit; large businesses that provide inadequate health coverage are subject to an excise tax. The medical deduction threshold is increased to 10% of adjusted gross income. And, in a provision not related to health care, Forms 1099 will now be required for payments of $600 or more to corporations (see sidebar, “Provisions Unrelated to Health Care,” at bottom of page).

This article describes many of the tax items in the two acts applicable to individuals and businesses. Note that most of these items do not take effect until future years.

PROVISIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS

Premium assistance credit. The Patient Protection Act provides for a refundable tax credit that eligible taxpayers can use to help cover the cost of premiums for health insurance purchased through a state health benefit exchange (which each state is required to establish under the act). Under new IRC § 36B, an eligible individual will enroll in a plan offered through an exchange and report his or her income to the exchange. Based on the information provided to the exchange and his or her income, the individual will receive a premium assistance credit. The Treasury Department will pay the premium assistance credit amount directly to the insurance plan in which the individual is enrolled. The individual will then pay to the plan in which he or she is enrolled the dollar difference between the premium tax credit amount and the total premium charged for the plan. Alternatively, eligible individuals can pay for the insurance out of pocket and then claim the credit on their tax returns.

Eligibility for the premium assistance credit is based on the individual’s income for the tax year ending two years prior to the enrollment period. The premium assistance credit is available for individuals (single or joint filers) with household incomes between 100% and 400% of the federal poverty level (for the family size involved) who do not received health insurance through an employer or a spouse’s employer. The credit amount is determined by the secretary of Health and Human Services, based on the amount by which premiums exceed a threshold amount. The threshold rises from 2% of income for those at 100% of the federal poverty level for the family size involved to 9.5% of income for those at 400% of the federal poverty level for the family size involved.

The Reconciliation Act provides for an inflation adjustment in the starting and ending percentages for years after 2014. The adjustment will be based on the rate of premium growth for the preceding calendar year over that year’s rate of income growth.

After 2018, the inflation adjustment will be based on the rate of premium growth for the preceding calendar year over that year’s consumer price index growth, but only if the aggregate amount of premium assistance tax credits and cost-sharing reductions (under section 1402 of the Patient Protection Act) for the preceding calendar year exceeds an amount equal to 0.504% of the gross domestic product for the preceding calendar year.

The premium assistance credit will be available for years ending after Dec. 31, 2013.

Excise tax on uninsured individuals. The Patient Protection Act creates new IRC § 5000A, which requires U.S. citizens and legal residents to maintain minimum amounts of health insurance coverage. Minimum essential coverage includes various government-sponsored programs, eligible employer-sponsored plans, plans in the individual market, grandfathered group health plans, and other coverage as recognized by the secretary of Health and Human Services in coordination with the Treasury secretary. The coverage requirement would not apply to individuals who are incarcerated, are not legally present in the United States, or qualify for a religious exemption.

Individuals who fail to maintain minimum essential coverage will be subject to a penalty equal to the greater of (1) 2.5% of the amount by which the taxpayer’s household income for the tax year exceeds the threshold amount of income required for income tax return filing under section 6012(a)(1); or (2) $695 per uninsured adult in the household. The penalty will be phased in from 2014–2016. For 2014, the penalty will be the greater of 1% of household income over the filing threshold or $95; for 2015, it will be the greater of 2% of household income over the filing threshold or $325; and for 2016 it will be the full 2.5% or $695.

The act specifies that liens and seizures are not authorized to enforce this penalty, and noncompliance will not be subject to criminal penalties. The excise tax on uninsured individuals has been criticized as unconstitutional, and it has been challenged in a lawsuit brought by several state attorneys general (Florida v. Dept. of Health and Human Services, docket no. 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT (N.D. Fla., filed 3/23/10)).

This provision is effective for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2013.

Adult dependent. The Reconciliation Act raises the age up to which parents can carry their children on their health insurance policy. It does this by changing the definition of “dependent” for purposes of IRC § 105(b) (excluding from income amounts received under a health insurance plan) to include amounts expended for the medical care of any child of the taxpayer who has not yet reached age 27. The same change is made in section 162(l)(1) for purposes of the self-employed health insurance deduction, section 501(c)(9) for purposes of benefits provided to members of a VEBA, and in section 401(h) for benefits for retirees. These changes were effective upon enactment.

Medical care itemized deduction threshold. The threshold for the itemized deduction for unreimbursed medical expenses is increased from 7.5% of AGI to 10% of AGI for regular income tax purposes. This is effective for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2012, except that in the years 2013–2016, if either the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s spouse has turned 65 before the end of the tax year, the increased threshold does not apply and the threshold remains at 7.5% of AGI.

Additional hospital insurance tax on high-income taxpayers. Under the Patient Protection Act, the employee portion of the hospital insurance tax part of FICA, currently 1.45% of covered wages, is increased by 0.9% on wages that exceed a threshold amount. The additional tax is imposed on the combined wages of both the taxpayer and the taxpayer’s spouse, in the case of a joint return. The threshold amount is $250,000 in the case of a joint return or surviving spouse, $125,000 in the case of a married individual filing a separate return, and $200,000 in any other case.

For self-employed taxpayers, the same additional hospital insurance tax applies to the hospital insurance portion of SECA tax on self-employment income in excess of the threshold amount.

The provision applies to remuneration received and tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2012.

Medicare tax on investment income. The Reconciliation Act added a new IRC § 1411 that imposes a tax on individuals equal to 3.8% of the lesser of the individual’s net investment income for the year or the amount the individual’s modified adjusted gross income exceeds a threshold amount. For estates and trusts, the tax equals 3.8% of the lesser of undistributed net investment income or adjusted gross income over the dollar amount at which the highest trust and estate tax bracket begins.

For married individuals filing a joint return and surviving spouses, the threshold amount is $250,000; for married taxpayers filing separately, it is $125,000; and for other individuals it is $200,000.

Net investment income means investment income reduced by deductions properly allocable to that income. Investment income is defined as income from interest, dividends, annuities, royalties and rents, and net gain from disposition of property, other than such income derived in the ordinary course of a trade or business (however, income from passive activities and from a trade or business of trading in financial instruments or commodities is included in the definition of net investment income).

This provision applies to tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2012.

Return information disclosure. The Patient Protection Act allows the IRS, upon written request of the secretary of Health and Human Services, to disclose certain taxpayer return information if the taxpayer’s income is relevant in determining the amount of the tax credit or cost-sharing reduction or eligibility for participation in the specified state health subsidy programs.

Upon written request from the commissioner of Social Security, the IRS may disclose certain limited return information of a taxpayer whose Medicare Part D premium subsidy, according to the records of the Treasury secretary, may be subject to adjustment.

Flexible spending arrangement. The Patient Protection Act mandates that the maximum amount available for reimbursement of incurred medical expenses of an employee, the employee’s dependents, and any other eligible beneficiaries with respect to the employee, under a health flexible spending arrangement for a plan year (or other 12-month coverage period) must not exceed $2,500. The provision is effective for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2012.

Restrictions on use of HSA and FSA funds. Under the Patient Protection Act, amounts paid for over-the-counter medications will no longer be reimbursable from health savings accounts (HSAs), Archer medical savings accounts (MSAs), health FSAs, or health reimbursement arrangements. Amounts paid for a drug will only meet the definition of “qualified medical expenses” in sections 106, 220 and 223 if the drug is a prescribed drug (or is insulin). This provision is effective for amounts paid or expenses incurred after Dec. 31, 2010.

Tax on HSA distributions. The additional tax on distributions from an HSA or an Archer MSA that are not used for qualified medical expenses is increased to 20% of the disbursed amount, effective for disbursements made during tax years starting after Dec. 31, 2010. (Under prior law, the tax was 10% of the disbursed amount for HSAs and 15% for Archer MSAs.)

Cafeteria plans. The Patient Protection Act makes premiums for coverage under a qualified health plan offered through an exchange a qualified benefit under a cafeteria plan. This provision applies only to cafeteria plans established by a small employer that elects to make all its full-time employees eligible for one or more qualified plans offered in the small group market through an exchange.

This provision is effective for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2013.

PROVISIONS FOR BUSINESSES

Small business tax credit. The Patient Protection Act provides tax credits for small businesses and individuals designed to increase levels of health insurance coverage, as part of the IRC § 38 general business credit. Small businesses—defined as businesses with 25 or fewer employees and average annual wages of less than $50,000—are eligible for a credit of up to 50% of nonelective contributions the business makes on behalf of its employees for insurance premiums (new IRC § 45R). Tax-exempt organizations would get a 35% credit against payroll taxes.

Employers with 10 or fewer employees and average wages of less than $25,000 will get 100% of the credit; for other eligible employers, the credit will be reduced based on the number of employees over 10 and the excess of the employees’ average wages over $25,000. The $25,000 average annual wages figure will be indexed for inflation after 2013. 

This credit is available for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2009, and is phased in from 2010 through 2013. During the phase-in years, the maximum credit is 35% of the employer’s eligible premium expense (25% for tax-exempt employers).

Employer responsibility. Under new IRC § 4980H, an “applicable large employer” that does not offer coverage for all its full-time employees, offers minimum essential coverage that is unaffordable, or offers minimum essential coverage that consists of a plan under which the plan’s share of the total allowed cost of benefits is less than 60%, is required to pay a penalty if any full-time employee is certified to the employer as having purchased health insurance through a state exchange with respect to which a tax credit or cost-sharing reduction is allowed or paid to the employee.

An employer is an applicable large employer with respect to any calendar year if it employed an average of at least 50 full-time employees during the preceding calendar year.

The penalty for any month is an excise tax equal to the number of full-time employees over a 30-employee threshold during the applicable month (regardless of how many employees are receiving a premium tax credit or cost-sharing reduction) multiplied by $166.67 (one-twelfth of $2,000).

This provision is effective for months beginning after Dec. 31, 2013.

Prescription drug coverage deduction. The Patient Protection Act eliminates the IRC § 139A deduction for employers who subsidize prescription drug coverage for their employees who are eligible for Medicare Part D. This provision is effective for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2010.

Reporting requirements. The Patient Protection Act requires insurers (including employers who self-insure) that provide minimum essential coverage to any individual during a calendar year to report certain health insurance coverage information to both the covered individual and to the IRS (new IRC § 6055).
The information required to be reported includes: (1) the name, address and taxpayer identification number of the primary insured, and the name and taxpayer identification number of each other individual obtaining coverage under the policy; (2) the dates during which the individual was covered under the policy during the calendar year; (3) whether the coverage is a qualified health plan offered through an exchange; (4) the amount of any premium tax credit or cost-sharing reduction received by the individual with respect to such coverage; and (5) such other information as the Treasury secretary may require.

This requirement is effective for calendar years beginning after 2013.

Information reporting. The Patient Protection Act requires employers to disclose on each employee’s annual Form W-2 the value of the employee’s health insurance coverage sponsored by the employer, effective for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2010.

Tax-exempt health insurers. The Patient Protection Act provides for a program administered by the Department of Health and Human Services to encourage the creation of qualified nonprofit health insurance issuers to offer health insurance. Insurers receiving federal grants or loans under the program would be exempt from federal tax (under IRC § 501(a)) for periods when the insurer complies with the terms of the program.

Fees on health plans. Under new IRC § 4375, a fee is imposed on each specified health insurance policy. The fee is equal to $2 ($1 in policy years ending during fiscal year 2013) multiplied by the average number of lives covered under the policy. The issuer of the policy is liable for payment of the fee.

New IRC § 4376 imposes a similar fee on self-insured health plans, equal to $2 ($1 in policy years ending during fiscal year 2013) multiplied by the average number of lives covered under the plan.

For any policy year beginning after Sept. 30, 2014, under both IRC §§ 4375 and 4376, the dollar amount is equal to the sum of the dollar amount for policy years ending in the preceding fiscal year plus an amount equal to the product of (1) the dollar amount for policy years ending in the preceding fiscal year, multiplied by (2) the percentage increase in the most recent projected per capita amount of national health expenditures.

The fee is effective with respect to policies and plans for portions of policy or plan years beginning on or after Oct. 1, 2012.

Charitable hospitals. The Patient Protection Act establishes new requirements applicable to section 501(c)(3) hospitals, regarding conducting a community health needs assessment, adopting a written financial assistance policy, limitations on charges, and collection activities.

Excise tax on high-cost employer plans. New IRC § 4980I imposes an excise tax on insurers if the aggregate value of employer-sponsored health insurance coverage for an employee (including, for purposes of the provision, any former employee, surviving spouse and any other primary insured individual) exceeds a threshold amount. The tax is equal to 40% of the aggregate value that exceeds the threshold amount. For 2018, the threshold amount is $10,200 for individual coverage and $27,500 for family coverage, multiplied by the health cost adjustment percentage (as defined in the act) and increased by the age and gender adjusted excess premium amount (as defined in the act).

Retirees and employees in certain high-risk professions or who repair or install electrical or telecommunications lines have a higher limit. After 2018, the annual limitation is adjusted for inflation.

The provision is effective for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017.

Medical device excise tax. The Reconciliation Act added new IRC § 4191, which imposes a 2.3% excise tax on sales of certain medical devices. The tax applies to sales of any medical device intended for humans (as defined in section 201(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. § 321(h))), except eyeglasses, contact lenses, hearing aids, and medical devices generally sold at retail to the public for individual use. This provision is effective for sales after Dec. 31, 2012.

SIMPLE cafeteria plans for small businesses. The Patient Protection Act establishes a SIMPLE cafeteria plan for small businesses. Under the provision, an eligible small employer is provided with a safe harbor from the nondiscrimination requirements for cafeteria plans as well as from the nondiscrimination requirements for specified qualified benefits offered under a cafeteria plan, including group term life insurance, benefits under a self-insured medical expense reimbursement plan, and benefits under a dependent care assistance program. Under the safe harbor, a cafeteria plan and the specified qualified benefits are treated as meeting the specified nondiscrimination rules if the cafeteria plan satisfies minimum eligibility and participation requirements and minimum contribution requirements.

The provision is effective for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2010.

The health care legislation contains several tax provisions unrelated to health care. These include:

Information reporting. The Patient Protection Act requires businesses to file an information return (for example, a Form 1099) for all payments aggregating $600 or more in a calendar year to a single payee, including corporations (other than a payee that is a tax-exempt corporation). The provision is effective for payments made after Dec. 31, 2011.

Expansion of adoption credit, adoption-assistance programs. For 2010, the maximum adoption credit is increased to $13,170 per eligible child (a $1,000 increase). This increase applies to both non-special-needs adoptions and special-needs adoptions. Also, the adoption credit is made refundable. The new dollar limit and phase out of the adoption credit are adjusted for inflation in tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2010. The scheduled sunset of Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act (EGTRRA) provisions relating to the adoption credit is delayed for one year (that is, the sunset becomes effective for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2011).

For adoption-assistance programs, the maximum exclusion is increased to $13,170 per eligible child (a $1,000 increase). The new dollar limit and income limitations of the employer-provided adoption-assistance exclusion are adjusted for inflation in tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2010. The EGTRRA sunset of provisions relating to adoption-assistance programs is also delayed for one year (that is, the sunset becomes effective for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2011). Under the sunset, after 2011, the adoption credit will revert to its pre-EGTRRA provisions (that is, a $6,000 credit for special-needs children only), and the income exclusion will disappear.

Economic substance doctrine. The Reconciliation Act codifies the economic substance doctrine in new IRC § 7701(o). The provision says that a transaction will be treated as having economic substance only if the transaction changes the taxpayer’s position in a meaningful way (apart from the tax benefits) and the taxpayer has a substantial purpose (apart from the tax benefits) for entering into the transaction.

The economic substance doctrine was created by the courts, and while they agree about the general definition and purpose, they have applied various tests in determining whether a transaction has economic substance. The act codifies a two-part test and requires transactions to meet both prongs of the test.

The Reconciliation Act puts failure to meet the economic substance test within the list of transactions that are subject to penalty under IRC § 6662 and imposes an increased penalty amount for nondisclosed transactions that lack economic substance. The act also removes transactions that lack economic substance from the reasonable cause exception in IRC § 6664.

Tax on indoor tanning services. The Patient Protection Act imposes a 10% tax on amounts paid for indoor tanning services (new IRC § 5000B). Like a sales tax, the tax will be collected from the person tanning when payment for the tanning services is made. The provision applies to services performed on or after July 1, 2010.

Want to Know About Your Refund?

April 29, 2010

Federal Income Taxes on Middle-Income Families at Historically Low Levels

April 18, 2010

By Chuck Marr and Gillian Brunet

Middle-income Americans are now paying federal taxes at or near historically low levels, according to the latest available data. That’s true whether it comes to their federal income taxes or their total federal taxes.

Income taxes: A family of four in the exact middle of the income spectrum will pay only 4.6 percent of its income in federal income taxes this year, according to a new analysis by the Urban Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center. This is the second-lowest percentage in the past 50 years.

Overall federal taxes: Middle-income households are paying overall federal taxes — which include income as well as payroll and excise taxes — at or near their lowest levels in decades, according to the latest data from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

Federal Income Taxes Have Declined Significantly in Recent Decades

Federal income taxes on middle-income families have declined significantly in recent decades (see Figure 1).

In 2000, the year before the 2001 tax cut that President Bush and Congress enacted, the median-income family of four paid 8.0 percent of its income in individual income taxes, according to Tax Policy Center estimates — a smaller share than in any year since 1967 (except for 1998 and 1999). [1] The Bush tax cuts further reduced middle-income tax obligations.

This year, the Making Work Pay tax credit, which President Obama and Congress enacted as part of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, is providing a credit of $800 to married joint filers ($400 to single filers). A median-income family with two children thus will receive an $800 tax cut in the return it files this year.

With the new tax cut, the median family’s federal income taxes will equal just 4.6 percent of its income in 2009. That is lower than in any year since 1955 (the first year for which these data are available) except for 2008, when another stimulus-related tax cut was in effect.

The 4.6 percent effective tax rate — the percentage of its income that a family pays in taxes — is well below the 15 percent marginal tax rate that a family of four in the exact middle of the income spectrum faces. Typically, such a family reduces its effective tax rate by taking the standard deduction (or, in some cases, itemized deductions), personal exemptions, and tax credits such as the child tax credit. The Making Work Pay tax credit further reduces that family’s effective tax rate.

Overall Federal Taxes Also at Low Levels

The decline in income taxes on middle-class households in recent years has driven a decline in these households’ overall federal taxes.

Households in the middle fifth of the income spectrum paid an average of 14.2 percent of their income in overall federal taxes in 2006, the latest year for which data are available, according to CBO.[2] This is just slightly above this group’s effective tax rate of 13.8 percent in 2003, which was the lowest level since at least 1979.

Most Americans pay more in payroll taxes, which support Social Security and Medicare, than they do in income taxes. Thus, the 14.2 percent figure reflects the impact of payroll taxes far more than income taxes.

Due to the impact of the recession and the temporary tax cuts in the Recovery Act, particularly the Making Work Pay tax credit, CBO data for 2009 (when they become available) will likely show that middle-income families faced significantly lower effective overall federal tax rates than in 2006.

End Notes:

[1] Tax Policy Center, “Historical Federal Income Tax Rates for a Family of Four,” April 12, 2010. The Tax Policy Center’s estimates were derived by updating (using Treasury’s methodology) a 1998 Treasury Department analysis that examined changes since 1955 in the percentage of income that the median-income family of four pays in federal income taxes.

[2] The CBO study covers the 1979-2006 period and includes federal income, payroll, and excise taxes. Congressional Budget Office, “Historical Effective Federal Tax Rates, 1979-2006,” April 2009.

Business Tax Tip of the Day Apil 9 2010

April 9, 2010

The amount of investment interest expense deduction is limited to the amount of the taxpayer’s net investment income. The excess is carried forward and treated as an amount of investment interest expense incurred in the next year.

‘Tis the Season for Catching Tax Scofflaws

April 7, 2010
By CATHERINE RAMPELL

If your fear of getting caught for tax fraud starts to spike in the next few weeks, it’s probably by design. The Internal Revenue Service appears to deliberately ramp up publicity of its tax

Stuart Rohatiner, CPA, JD

 fraud cases just before Tax Day, a new study finds.

The paper, by Joshua D. Blank and Daniel Z. Levin, looked at press releases issued by the Department of Justice’s Tax Division from 2003 to 2009 in which the agency announced a civil or criminal tax enforcement action against a specific taxpayer identified by name. They found that the number of press releases issued by the I.R.S. per week more than doubles in the fortnight preceding April 15 compared to the rest of the year:

The authors suggest that this trend is probably part of the I.R.S.’s fraud deterrence strategy:

By presenting individual taxpayers with vivid examples in which the I.R.S. has detected tax fraud — whether it involves a popular celebrity’s phony business deductions, a high-profile banker’s offshore bank account or a local tire salesman’s underreporting of gross  income — the government may provide an individual taxpayer with available images that showcase the I.R.S.’s detection capabilities. Because the government consistently provides more of these images to individual taxpayers during the weeks leading up to Tax Day than it does during other times of the year, individual taxpayers may draw upon these available images as they teeter on the decision to claim questionable tax positions on their annual individual tax returns. … In reality, a rational individual taxpayer should recognize that the chance that the I.R.S. will detect and challenge a claim of an illegitimate tax position is very low (1.03 percent in 2009).

Don’t Have Enough To Pay Your Taxes?

March 26, 2010

What do you do when you finally get all of your information together to file your income taxes, and you find out that not only aren’t you getting a tax refund, but you actually have to pay taxes?! It’s not a problem if you have enough money set aside to pay it off, but for people who don’t have enough money in their bank account to pay their taxes, this can be a very scary experience.

First of all, you don’t need to panic. You are not the first (or the last!) person to owe the IRS money and not have access to the money immediately to pay them back. These are some tips for paying your taxes when you don’t have the money to pay on time.

File your taxes on time.

Even if you owe a ton of money and have no idea where you’ll get it, you need to file your taxes on time (including filing for an extension). If you send your information in late, you’ll be adding fees and penalties to the amount you owe. If you decide not to file your taxes at all — you’ll be looking at criminal charges.

Check all resources.

Take a look in all of your savings accounts and investments to see if there is any way you can come up with the money to pay your taxes. Think about friends or family who may be able to lend you the money.

Get an installment plan.

The IRS can also help you set up a payment plan if you can’t pay for your taxes in one lump sum. When you file your return, you’ll receive a letter from the IRS that states how much you owe. Begin saving money and looking for ways to pay your taxes. If you know for sure you won’t be able to pay your taxes in a lump sum, ask the IRS for the installment plan. You can indicate how much you feel you can afford and as long as you will pay off the balance in a 12 month period, the IRS will usually grant you an installment plan. Having an installment plan will cost you additional money in fees, but it gives you an opportunity to pay it over time.

Apply for Offer of Compromise.

If you get turned down for the installment plan with the IRS, you might consider the Offer of Compromise. This lets you make a one time payment or schedule several payments over time but is a much more involved process than asking for an installment plan. It also costs $150 to apply and each person is evaluated individually based on their financial situation. You are not guaranteed approval even if you pay the $150 application fee so you will want to try the installment plan option first.

If you owe money to the IRS, the worst thing you can do is sit back and hope it goes away. The longer you wait, the harder it will be to pay it because the penalties and fees will continue to add up. The best you could hope for after waiting and hoping it will all go away is a tax settlement of some sort! You need to establish a plan of action that works for your financial situation right now, and follow through with it until the amount you owe is paid in full.